This guide outlines key points about SEIS and EIS eligibility, particularly:
How HMRC determines the start of trading
How minimal or experimental revenue is treated
Whether and when to apply for Advance Assurance (AA)
Distinctions between SEIS and EIS rules related to trading dates
For the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS), HMRC considers trading to have begun when the company first makes goods or services available for sale.
Importantly, actual revenue is not required.
Trading begins at the point where:
The business is genuinely open for sales, or
The company is actively attempting to generate income from its product or service.
In example:

Even if no one buys anything for months, trading has commenced once the company is open to receiving revenue.
Companies often run:
Market-testing exercises
Pilot product sales
Early GTM (go-to-market) experiments
Small sample sales
Any attempt to sell - even generating very small revenue - can count as trading for SEIS purposes.
This includes:
De minimis sales
Test-market transactions
Non-recurring or experimental income
Undertaking a single day consultancy via the startup, even if this isn't directly related to the planned trade of the startup in due course.
Once trading has begun, it triggers the SEIS rule that the company must have been trading for less than 3 years at the time of investment.
SEIS: strict interpretation
EIS: more flexible
For the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS), HMRC guidance allows companies in some cases to ignore very limited sales made purely to test the market.
This distinction applies to EIS only - not SEIS.
This is referenced in VCM8151.
A common misunderstanding is that a company must be less than three years old to qualify for SEIS.
The correct rule:
Example: A company incorporated in 2015 is still eligible for SEIS in 2025 if it has not yet started trading.
Advance Assurance provides written confirmation from HMRC that a company is likely to qualify for SEIS/EIS based on the information supplied.
While not legally required, AA is important because:
Many investors will not commit funds without it.
It reduces investor risk.
It provides clarity in situations where trading dates or eligibility might be ambiguous.
If a company is not SEIS-eligible (e.g., trading started too long ago), it can still seek AA purely for EIS. AA gives investor confidence regardless of the SEIS outcome.
During the Advance Assurance application, HMRC may ask for a start of trading date, but:
You can answer “Not trading yet” if correct.
HMRC will not challenge or confirm the date at this stage.
During the SEIS1/EIS1 compliance process is when the trading date becomes formally assessed and used to determine eligibility.
SEIS trading date starts when you start to trade (ie offer sales), not when revenue arrives.
Even micro-revenues from GTM experiments will start the 3-year SEIS clock.
EIS has more flexible treatment of “limited market-testing sales.”
AA is mainly to reassure investors.
Company age ≠ trading age. You can incorporate long before you begin trading.
You can start a funding round in minutes with a free FounderCatalyst account, experiment with our service and see how easy it would be to save time, money, and emotional resources by using FounderCatalyst when raising your next funding round.
You can see a sample of the paperwork we'd generate, invite colleagues to act as investors, and truly experiment with how easy we make it. Then cancel the experiment round when you're ready to start a real one!
Ask away...